Vikidia currently has 4,381 articles. Improve it!

Join Vikidia: create your account now and improve it!

Vikidia:Request for deletion

From Vikidia, the encyclopedia for 8 to 13-year-old children that everybody can make better
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Request pages

Administrators: Vikidia:Request for deletion - Vikidia:Requests/Administrators

Bureaucrats: Vikidia:Requests/Bureaucrats



Deleting a page is governed by a number of rules. If you want to see a page deleted, follow the follow steps:

  1. Place the template {{Regular delete}} on the page.
  2. List the page here with reason and other stuff if needed.
  3. You can notify the creator of the article about the nomination with {{Warn delete}}.

A discussion will be followed by a vote if necessary. The voting period is seven days.


For more information around the deletion process, see Vikidia:Deletion.

Current proposals[edit | edit source]

Category:Numbers 60 and Over and Category:3 Multiples[edit | edit source]

I don't understand the useful of this categories because Vikidia is not a site of numbers.

  1. delete Delete : see reason.--Simon2001 (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  2. Neutral Neutral or delete Delete, I am not sure but you can count my vote as a delete vote.S25265 (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  3. delete Delete : inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Deborahjay (talk) 15:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete Just advertisement and not useful for an encyclopedia. Adnan Bla? 21:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  2. Keep Keep The content looks appropriate, not advertising. This is compared with the substantial article in the English Wikipedia, so it's a notable topic. I'm willing to improve the page here. Deborahjay (talk) 11:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
  3. Keep Keep, I don't see any advertising. S25265 message? 12:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
  4. Keep Keep, The page does not look like advertisement and instead useful for a educational encyclopedia.Puss (talk) 16:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:Active[edit | edit source]

Supporting as nominator: this is a pointless template. We don't need something to stick on your userpage to tell us you're active - we know you're active, because you post, contribute and turn up in the RecentChanges list. This really isn't necessary. DaneGeld (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

  • delete Delete : used by one user.--Simon2001 (talk) 10:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Dick Cheney[edit | edit source]

  1. Support Support the Delete. There is no sources to prove this info and he is still alive. Either someone needs to delete this page or add sources. S25265 Try yourself!! 15:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Keep per En:Wikipedia. Wildkratts19892 (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC

PewDiePie[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete. Where are the sources? S25265 Try yourself!! 17:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. Keep Keep. I put some sources... BakhosYT Say hi! 16:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Closed proposals[edit | edit source]

For older proposals, please consult the archives.

Dutch–Portuguese War[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete This is a fake article, with a textual connection to the Thilakamuni fake article Oriolederby (talk) 13:28, 27 August 2018 (CEST)
  2. Keep Keep Definitely intended as vandalism, but it was a real conflict. I rewrote the article. Ranch Dressing (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2018 (CET)

Jose Rafael Cordero Sanchez[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete As nominator, this article has been previously deleted twice through this process, and has again been created by the same family of IP addresses responsible for the Long Term Abuse mentioned in the previous RfD detailed at the bottom of this page. I don't like to delete an article right off the bat without passing it through other people's attention. In this case, I am requesting authority as an administrator to delete AND content protect this article, to prevent its recreation. The subject is no more notable now than they were when the article was first posted. DaneGeld (talk) 23:08, 14 August 2018 (CEST)
  2. delete Delete : Ok for deletion and page protection. Rome2 (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2018 (CEST)

User:[edit | edit source]

 Done - Deleted: IP addresses do not have a user page. DaneGeld (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Semen[edit | edit source]

Aladdin (film)[edit | edit source]

delete Delete as nominator, this piece is a direct copy and paste from the English Wikipedia. This article has previously been deleted for exactly the same thing and been recreated. Have warned the user who copied the article in. DaneGeld (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep Keep Chris! Give him time and let him put what is necessary for the movie! User:kirbipro (User talk:Kirbipro) Written on 22nd April at 18:08 Spanish Hour.

User:[edit | edit source]

User:[edit | edit source]

Roblox[edit | edit source]

delete Delete The article is very short and don't is format of encyclopedia--Gota de agua (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Keep It is not a test page and it is okay for it to be short, as it can be expanded. I really don’t think this is a valid reason for deletion. However, I will try to improve the article. CaillouFan (talk) 21:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete as nominator: This page is basically a massive advert for a gaming website or game (I can't figure out which). It just shows you a picture of the game, gives a web adress and lots of different names for the site/game. It also tells you the instructions. Not useful for an encyclopedia. DaneGeld (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2018 (CEST)
  2. Keep Keep I have rewritten the article - which was reverted - despite the EXACT same thing happening earlier in vikidia's history. Felix R. | Talk? 00:26, 20 June 2018 (CEST) 00:26, 20 June 2018 (CEST)
I have explained why your edits were reverted. I wasn't here to see the older edits, or I'd have done the same to those too. Once deletion tags are placed on an article, they must not be removed until the deletion is completed and decided upon. Your edits removed the deletion tag from the work, and were reverted for that reason. Feel free to rewrite the article, but don't remove the deletion tags until people have decided what to do with it. DaneGeld (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2018 (CEST)
Okay. Sorry. Felix R. | Talk? 01:30, 20 June 2018 (CEST)
  1. Keep Keep seems a good article. — Tintle · 13:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Masturbation[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete This is obviously inappropriate and unnecessary for 8-13 year olds, and basically nonsense.
  2. delete Delete Maybe the topic could be somehow handled, as done on Vikidia in French, but the page as it is should be deleted (current content not kept in history) for sure. Klipe (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2018 (CET)
  3. delete Delete I agree with the first comment: This is a website for kids, and I don't think that they should learn this kinda of things. --Dorami-Doraemon (talk) 08:51, 20 February 2018 (CET)
  4. Keep Keep I have rewritten this article.The subject may be of interest to 12-13 year olds.Magasin3 (talk) 13:20, 21 February 2018 (CET)

5. Keep Keep - Notification Linedwell and Dorami-Doraemon: Regardless of what you think, 8 year old children will read this. You may be surprised to learn that children start to experiment with masturbation at a lot younger age. It's better that it's explained properly and in a place where it can be written for children to understand, than to have their peers and adults around them fill their heads with lots of stupid stories about it making you go blind, makes you grow hair on your hands and so on. This is a wiki for kids who are learning about themselves and the world around them - masturbation is a perfectly normal part of their growing up. Their bodies need to grow with their minds and there is nothing wrong about teaching them what their bodies go through. There are some kids who start puberty before they're 10! Why shouldn't they learn? DaneGeld (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2018 (CEST)

Notification Magasin3: The problem is not what the article says. The problem is the topic of the page. Dorami-Doraemon (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2018 (CET)
Yes but teens (12-13 years) might be interested in this article. Magasin3 (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2018 (CET)
Notification Dorami-Doraemon: Is this better to find the description of what it is on page page written by and for children or let them search it by themself on Internet ?. Regarding the page on Vikidia, if someone find it, it is because he searched it. Regards, Linedwell (talk) 10:33, 26 February 2018 (CET)
Notification Linedwell and Magasin3:(or I should say FNDA): There're 3 votes to delete the page, against 1 to keep it. So, please, delete the page. I am not going to change my opinion, and there're more votes to delete it than to keep it.

So, following the rules, you've to delete it (the majority voters said that the page should be deleted). And an other thing: Vikidia is for kids between 8 and 13 years. So, may be interesting for 12-13 year old kids... But what about 8-9-10 year old kids? Do you think this page is apropiate for 8-9 year old kids? Here, in vikidia, there're 8 year old kids, as I said, and I do not think that they should read things like that one. May be interesting for 12 year old kid, ok, but not for 8 year old kids, as I said before. So, that's why it should be deleted IN MY PERSONAL OPINION. If you want a wiki for 12-13 year old kids, MAKE YOUR OWN WIKI, but this is for 8-13 year old kids, so 8 year old kids may read this. And if you do not believe me, ask Astirmays, this wiki founder, and he will tell you that I am right, there are 8 year old kids reading vikidia, and I repeat, I don't think that masturbation is apropiate or interesting for they. Best regards. Dorami-Doraemon (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2018 (CET)

Lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphiokarabomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygon[edit | edit source]

This page can be vandalism.Scratcheur-2020Send (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

KEPT - This is not vandalism. The page is marked as a work in progress, and the article it is linked to on Wikipedia confirms it is a valid work. I will speak to the user who is preparing the article, and arrange to move it to their sandbox until it is ready for publication. DaneGeld (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification DaneGeld and Scratcheur-2020Send: Done I moved the page into my sandbox.--Ajeje Brazorf (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Amogus[edit | edit source]

delete Delete--Unnecessary and empty content. Sad Adnan SUPERMAN!--Bla bla bla blaaaa 06:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done, Linedwell (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Notification Adnan: the next time you can use the template:Delete on the page that you want to delete.--ANGELO (a.k.a. Ajeje Brazorf) 08:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Weapons[edit | edit source]

delete Delete--Adnan SUPERMAN!--Bla bla bla blaaaa 17:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Renee Fleming[edit | edit source]

10 Minute School[edit | edit source]

  • delete Delete Some sentences are same on en.Wikipedia without reference. Adnan--SAY BLA!!! 16:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Vikidia:Star articles/2022 Kazakh protests[edit | edit source]

  • delete Delete The star article is not as acceptable as stub, so no need for this request. Adnan Bla? 08:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Notification Adnan: You can vote Oppose Oppose on the voting page Wink CaesarAugustus (talk) 09:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Parth Siddhpura[edit | edit source]

Proposed delete: This page was created by an IP editor, and since then all but one edit have been by User:Parthsiddhpura, an account very likely created by the subject. The descriptive text is promotional in nature, e.g. "the youngest independent artist to gain popularity through social media in Gujarat... Although no one knows who Parth Siddhpura is, he became a well-known artist after gaining success in the music business..." The page has no reference citations. This is a young musician who doesn't have an encyclopedic career. The page seems not notable to include on Vikidia. Deborahjay (talk) 13:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

  1. delete Delete : IP had one contribution, and the changes are not in a longer time span. They are very suspicious users. I don't know if this article is true. Sus for me. Adnan Bla? 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Closed as cross wiki spam. Deleted and removed, creation protection will be applied. This article was posted earlier to the Catalan Vikidia, where I also removed it. DaneGeld (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Game Boy[edit | edit source]

Copied from other sites. Adnan Bla? 18:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

  1. delete Delete Adnan Bla? 18:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  2. delete Delete Plagiarism. An admin will be asked to look. S25265 (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  3. Keep Keep Highly notable topic in a popular category (video games). I don't see any plagiarism, at this point there's barely any text! Needs improved lead sentence and paragraph, categories, and Stub template. Deborahjay (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

CLOSED: Deletion declined. I have put the content of this article through 3 separate internet based plagiarism checkers, and all return the article as being 100% unique, with 0% plagiarism. I see no reason to remove the article. Closed as the requested reason to delete the article is proven not correct. DaneGeld (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Download.jpg[edit | edit source]

delete Delete I agree with adnan for deletion. this needs deletion or a change in title S25265 time

Closed: Deletion declined. File had been uploaded under a generic name; has been moved to the correct title, File:Flag of the Kingdom of Hannover.jpg. DaneGeld (talk) 23:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

101, 102 and 103[edit | edit source]

These articles are not very admissible because there are an infinity of numbers and the first numbers are sufficient.

  1. delete Delete : see reason.--Simon2001 (talk) 21:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  2. delete Delete Too many numbers. Why do we need these numbers. S25265 (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  3. delete Delete : All the individual number pages aren't appropriate in an encyclopedia. Deborahjay (talk) 15:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Closed: Unanimous to delete Delete. CaesarAugustus (talk) 08:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[edit | edit source]

As author, no voting. Adnan Bla? 21:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done! CaesarAugustus (talk)

Template:Support Ukraine[edit | edit source]

  • Support Support Political and we are a community. Such stuff should not be around kids in my opinion. — This unsigned comment was added by S25265 (talk • changes).
  • Support Support deletion: as I originally raised with the other administrators, and also with fr.vikidia (the origin of this template, where it is also up for deletion), we are here for all children, and only showing support for one side, makes us look like we don't care about the children on the other side. It's a war, and all children suffer in conflict. They are not the cause, they are all victims. This template is divisive and it needs to go. DaneGeld (talk) 11:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Support Support idem.--ANGELO (a.k.a. Ajeje Brazorf) 12:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
  • delete Delete I was not in favor of its creation on Vikidia in French. Idem on the English version. CaesarAugustus (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done: between the administrators, unanimously, we feel this template is inappropriate. It is a political statement, and one which Vikidia should not make. We support all children, who are victims of war everywhere. This template will be deleted. DaneGeld (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Andy Pettiete[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete, Needs sources. S25265 Try yourself!! 18:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Sockpuppets of Astirmays[edit | edit source]

the founder, Astirmays does not have any sockpuppets Puss (talk)

 Done! It was an usurpation. CaesarAugustus (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Ants video.mp4 ‎[edit | edit source]

Just delete this one, another one will stay. Adnan (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done, Linedwell (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Ghost (the beast)[edit | edit source]

Duplicate of Ghost Puss77 (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Gebruiker:BIGsmile/Handtekening and Gebruiker:BIGsmile/Handtekening2[edit | edit source]

Reason: tried to copy my signature from the dutch wiki to here but failed. BIGsmile (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Pabitra Banerjee[edit | edit source]

Reason: This type of articles aren't helpful and shouldn't be in Vikidia, ~~~~