Vikidia currently has 3,505 articles. Improve it!

Join Vikidia: create your account now and improve it!

Vikidia:Request for deletion

From Vikidia, the encyclopedia for 8 to 13-year-old children that everybody can make better
Jump to: navigation, search
Request pages

Administrators: Vikidia:Request for deletion - Vikidia:Requests/Administrators

Bureaucrats: Vikidia:Requests/Bureaucrats



Deleting a page is governed by a number of rules. If you want to see a page deleted, follow the follow steps:

  1. Place the template {{Regular delete}} on the page.
  2. List the page here with reason and other stuff if needed.
  3. You can notify the creator of the article about the nomination with {{Warn delete}}.

A discussion will be followed by a vote if necessary. The voting period is seven days.


For more information around the deletion process, see Vikidia:Deletion.

Current proposals[edit | edit source]

Dutch–Portuguese War[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete This is a fake article, with a textual connection to the Thilakamuni fake article Oriolederby (talk) 13:28, 27 August 2018 (CEST)
  2. Keep Keep Definitely intended as vandalism, but it was a real conflict. I rewrote the article. Ranch Dressing (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2018 (CET)

Jose Rafael Cordero Sanchez[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete As nominator, this article has been previously deleted twice through this process, and has again been created by the same family of IP addresses responsible for the Long Term Abuse mentioned in the previous RfD detailed at the bottom of this page. I don't like to delete an article right off the bat without passing it through other people's attention. In this case, I am requesting authority as an administrator to delete AND content protect this article, to prevent its recreation. The subject is no more notable now than they were when the article was first posted. DaneGeld (talk) 23:08, 14 August 2018 (CEST)
  2. delete Delete : Ok for deletion and page protection. Rome2 (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2018 (CEST)

User:[edit | edit source]

 Done - Deleted: IP addresses do not have a user page. DaneGeld (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Semen[edit | edit source]

Aladdin (film)[edit | edit source]

delete Delete as nominator, this piece is a direct copy and paste from the English Wikipedia. This article has previously been deleted for exactly the same thing and been recreated. Have warned the user who copied the article in. DaneGeld (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep Keep Chris! Give him time and let him put what is necessary for the movie! User:kirbipro (User talk:Kirbipro) Written on 22nd April at 18:08 Spanish Hour.

User:[edit | edit source]

User:[edit | edit source]

Roblox[edit | edit source]

delete Delete The article is very short and don't is format of encyclopedia--Gota de agua (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Keep It is not a test page and it is okay for it to be short, as it can be expanded. I really don’t think this is a valid reason for deletion. However, I will try to improve the article. CaillouFan (talk) 21:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete as nominator: This page is basically a massive advert for a gaming website or game (I can't figure out which). It just shows you a picture of the game, gives a web adress and lots of different names for the site/game. It also tells you the instructions. Not useful for an encyclopedia. DaneGeld (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2018 (CEST)
  2. Keep Keep I have rewritten the article - which was reverted - despite the EXACT same thing happening earlier in vikidia's history. Felix R. | Talk? 00:26, 20 June 2018 (CEST) 00:26, 20 June 2018 (CEST)
I have explained why your edits were reverted. I wasn't here to see the older edits, or I'd have done the same to those too. Once deletion tags are placed on an article, they must not be removed until the deletion is completed and decided upon. Your edits removed the deletion tag from the work, and were reverted for that reason. Feel free to rewrite the article, but don't remove the deletion tags until people have decided what to do with it. DaneGeld (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2018 (CEST)
Okay. Sorry. Felix R. | Talk? 01:30, 20 June 2018 (CEST)
  1. Keep Keep seems a good article. — Tintle · 13:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Masturbation[edit | edit source]

  1. delete Delete This is obviously inappropriate and unnecessary for 8-13 year olds, and basically nonsense.
  2. delete Delete Maybe the topic could be somehow handled, as done on Vikidia in French, but the page as it is should be deleted (current content not kept in history) for sure. Klipe (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2018 (CET)
  3. delete Delete I agree with the first comment: This is a website for kids, and I don't think that they should learn this kinda of things. --Dorami-Doraemon (talk) 08:51, 20 February 2018 (CET)
  4. Keep Keep I have rewritten this article.The subject may be of interest to 12-13 year olds.Magasin3 (talk) 13:20, 21 February 2018 (CET)

5. Keep Keep - Notification Linedwell and Dorami-Doraemon: Regardless of what you think, 8 year old children will read this. You may be surprised to learn that children start to experiment with masturbation at a lot younger age. It's better that it's explained properly and in a place where it can be written for children to understand, than to have their peers and adults around them fill their heads with lots of stupid stories about it making you go blind, makes you grow hair on your hands and so on. This is a wiki for kids who are learning about themselves and the world around them - masturbation is a perfectly normal part of their growing up. Their bodies need to grow with their minds and there is nothing wrong about teaching them what their bodies go through. There are some kids who start puberty before they're 10! Why shouldn't they learn? DaneGeld (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2018 (CEST)

Notification Magasin3: The problem is not what the article says. The problem is the topic of the page. Dorami-Doraemon (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2018 (CET)
Yes but teens (12-13 years) might be interested in this article. Magasin3 (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2018 (CET)
Notification Dorami-Doraemon: Is this better to find the description of what it is on page page written by and for children or let them search it by themself on Internet ?. Regarding the page on Vikidia, if someone find it, it is because he searched it. Regards, Linedwell (talk) 10:33, 26 February 2018 (CET)
Notification Linedwell and Magasin3:(or I should say FNDA): There're 3 votes to delete the page, against 1 to keep it. So, please, delete the page. I am not going to change my opinion, and there're more votes to delete it than to keep it.

So, following the rules, you've to delete it (the majority voters said that the page should be deleted). And an other thing: Vikidia is for kids between 8 and 13 years. So, may be interesting for 12-13 year old kids... But what about 8-9-10 year old kids? Do you think this page is apropiate for 8-9 year old kids? Here, in vikidia, there're 8 year old kids, as I said, and I do not think that they should read things like that one. May be interesting for 12 year old kid, ok, but not for 8 year old kids, as I said before. So, that's why it should be deleted IN MY PERSONAL OPINION. If you want a wiki for 12-13 year old kids, MAKE YOUR OWN WIKI, but this is for 8-13 year old kids, so 8 year old kids may read this. And if you do not believe me, ask Astirmays, this wiki founder, and he will tell you that I am right, there are 8 year old kids reading vikidia, and I repeat, I don't think that masturbation is apropiate or interesting for they. Best regards. Dorami-Doraemon (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2018 (CET)

Lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphiokarabomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygon[edit | edit source]

This page can be vandalism.Scratcheur-2020Send (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

KEPT - This is not vandalism. The page is marked as a work in progress, and the article it is linked to on Wikipedia confirms it is a valid work. I will speak to the user who is preparing the article, and arrange to move it to their sandbox until it is ready for publication. DaneGeld (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification DaneGeld and Scratcheur-2020Send: Done I moved the page into my sandbox.--Ajeje Brazorf (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Amogus[edit | edit source]

delete Delete--Unnecessary and empty content. Sad Adnan SUPERMAN!--Bla bla bla blaaaa 06:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done, Linedwell (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Notification Adnan: the next time you can use the template:Delete on the page that you want to delete.--ANGELO (a.k.a. Ajeje Brazorf) 08:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Ajeje--??? I was use it? Hey, I can't delete the page, im not administrator. Adnan SUPERMAN!--Bla bla bla blaaaa 10:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Weapons[edit | edit source]

delete Delete--Adnan SUPERMAN!--Bla bla bla blaaaa 17:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Closed proposals[edit | edit source]

For older proposals, please consult the archives.

Categories[edit | edit source]

Renee Fleming[edit | edit source]

5. Useless or extremely short pages[edit | edit source]