Vikidia:Request for permissions/Comedia

Comedia (Administrator)

Comedia (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
I want to become an administrator again because I can use that tools. I'll be active if I win this request. You know me: I'm an active user on es:vikidia and I have lot of contributions here too. My English isn't perfect, but I am learning more and more: Is better than last year. If you have any question, feel free to ask me. -- Comedia 22:20, 17 October 2014 (CEST)

Users can vote from 17 October 2014 until 24 October 2014.

Support

1.  Support You may need to be a bit more active if you plan on becoming an administrator. As a general note too, remember to keep your account secure (unrelated to the hacking matter, I still don't quite understand it). I don't see any reason to oppose, granted I've only been editing for around a month. Good luck, George.Edward.C ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 22:26, 17 October 2014 (CEST)
2.  Support - Somewhat per George.Edward.C. With all respect, but you should understand my confirmation against you. Unautorized people got access to you account, and they could access your adminaccount. But, if you can promise me to protect yourself better against this, I'm willing to support your adminship again, like your previous request. Southparkfan 10:40, 23 October 2014 (CEST)
3. ...

Oppose

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Neutral

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Questions/notes

• Thanks a lot. -- Comedia 18:51, 23 October 2014 (CEST)

Conclusion

With 2 support votes and no neutral/oppose votes, Comedia got the needed community consensus for adminship. Congratulations, I'll deal with the other stuff. Southparkfan 13:48, 15 November 2014 (CET)

Ok,  Done! :-) Astirmays (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2014 (CET)

Comedia (Administrator - confirmation)

Keep Comedia's rights

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Remove Comedia's rights

1.  Oppose - As starter of this confirmation. Southparkfan 19:41, 25 May 2014 (CEST)
2. If I understand the logs well, a blocked admin can unblock himself... Am I right? In that case, admin role should indeed be removed from any hacked account until the situation gets normalized. Next question: what does "hacked" mean in this case? Depending on how it may have happened, "the real Comedia" could revise his way to handle account and password, or use https (explicitly trusting tuxfamily's certificate)... Klipe (talk) 21:58, 27 May 2014 (CEST)
3. With regret I agree with what was said above. If the accounts security is at risk the user should not be an admin.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2014 (CEST)

Neutral

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Questions/notes

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Conclusion

With 0% of votes for keeping Comedia as a sysop, Comedia failed the confirmation and so far his rights will be removed immediately. I'll ask a bureaucrat to remove the rights. I'd like to thanks Comedia for his work. Southparkfan 22:06, 31 May 2014 (CEST)

 Done Hi, I'm not sure I understand well the hacking matter, and I don't know if we will ever really know. However I trust you on this point and I notice that there is a consensus for the removal of the admin's tools of Comedia. I guess that nobody has discussed before the way and rules we would follow for a confirmation or contesting someone's user right, anyway, it seems ok for this case. I hope the other admins - and every users - can make a good work on this wiki, and maybe even Comedia will be back as a good user ! :-) Astirmays (talk) 13:14, 1 June 2014 (CEST)

Comedia (Bureaucrat)

Comedia (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights) !Hello Vikidians! I want to request the bureaucrat flag because I think that is neccesary inn thi wiki. One user is support of that and nobody is oppose. You can see Vikidia:Talk/2014/20. Users can vote until May 18 to May 27.

Oppose

1.  Oppose Definitely, "no". Linedwell (talk) 18:42, 19 May 2014 (CEST)
2.  Oppose Foge2001 (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2014 (CEST)
3.  Oppose - Comedia is harassing users on IRC, playing with userrights (except the removal of autopatrol/patroller rights by admins, removal of autopatrol by patrollers, the first third rights changes and the last right change on the 18th of May, 19:15), did not say even sorry (or something like that) about harassing and "because I think that is neccesary inn thi wiki" contains (too) many grammar and spelling mistakes to say something like "well, his knowledge of the English language looks fine, I can trust on it", while a bureaucrat should have a good and enough knowledge of the English language. Added after moving vote neutral => oppose: Comedia thinks blocking his account is bad and should only be done when "Comedia" is on IRC. I don't have any good trust in Comedia as a possible bureaucrat. Southparkfan 14:45, 19 May 2014 (CEST)

Neutral

1.  Neutral - Comedia is harassing users on IRC, playing with userrights (except the removal of autopatrol/patroller rights by admins, removal of autopatrol by patrollers, the first third rights changes and the last right change on the 18th of May, 19:15), did not say even sorry (or something like that) about harassing and "because I think that is neccesary inn thi wiki" contains (too) many grammar and spelling mistakes to say something like "well, his knowledge of the English language looks fine, I can trust on it", while a bureaucrat should have a good and enough knowledge of the English language. By voting in the neutral section instead of the oppose section, I hereby give Comedia a chance to convince me that he is ready for it and that I don't have to worry about any problems with his bureaucrat work. Southparkfan 14:45, 19 May 2014 (CEST) - Moved to oppose.

1.  Neutral - My understanding of the role of a bureaucrat: a role to be used only seldom, to implement community decisions, with no personal visibility. Basically, the bureaucrat should not take his own feeling into account when using his bureaucrat rights... and that may sometimes be quite difficult! I think that Comedia is not yet ready for such a role. Klipe (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2014 (CEST)

Conclusion

0% support for bureaucrat rights, bureaucrat not granted. Southparkfan 21:59, 31 May 2014 (CEST)

Comedia (Administrator)

Comedia (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
I want to request this permission because (I think) that is the moment. Many users say that I change a lot and now I'm good user. Maybe I create more than 50 articles and I have 550 contributions. I hope that I will be a good admin, but it's the decision of the users! I'm a patroller.

If no other rules were set up for that, this vote will end after a week, which makes it opened till the 16th of February. We'll process it on the 17th. Astirmays (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2014 (CET)

With 100% of support Comedia is elected as an administrator. Southparkfan 11:34, 17 February 2014 (CET)

 Done ! I hope that Comedia will make some good work with his new tools to help on this wiki with all its other users ! :-) Astirmays (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2014 (CET)

Support

1.  Support, here , he can be a good sysop. A thing: don't misuse of this flag. --Sepp.P 20:02, 9 February 2014 (CET)
2.  Support--Lolo7433 (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2014 (CET).
3.  Support Rome2 (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2014 (CET)
4.  Support as announced, Comedia became a good user, and took notice of our advices. I hope he will use the broom with wisdom. Linedwell (talk) 17:35, 11 February 2014 (CET)
5.  Support: Good user--Seslowin (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2014 (CET).
6.  Support - Ok. Maybe I can use you for MW-namespace issues. Southparkfan 17:10, 14 February 2014 (CET)

Oppose

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Neutral

1.  Neutral - I don't know it yet. Southparkfan 16:21, 10 February 2014 (CET)

    Neutral, His behaviour has changed in the good way and his work on en.viki is appreciated. I will maybe turn this vote in a {{support}}. Linedwell (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2014 (CET)

2. ...

Questions/notes

1. Hi Comedia. On 2th January you was blocked by Vivi-1 with the reason Spamming links to external sites: have been warned on IRC and ES. Is that right? If yes, did you that also on Vikidia? And had Vivi-1 to assume good faith, or not? Southparkfan 16:29, 10 February 2014 (CET)

(edit conflict) Hi. I don't have a lot of idea of that. Astirmays undo the block because he don't like the block of Vivi-1. My contributions here are well. Vivi-1 hates me (I don't belive, is the true), but I don't want to hurt anybody. Regards. -- Comedia 16:40, 10 February 2014 (CET)

[edit conflict] Comedia linked others encyclopedyas that are copies of vikidia on the chat. I remember that Vivi-1 kick off him from the chat. Astirmays unblock Comedia after weeks, in January. --Sepp.P 21:29, 10 February 2014 (CET)

I only three days block on en.vikidia, not weeks... And I don't link copies of vikidia, only a wiki... -- Comedia 07:24, 11 February 2014 (CET)

Only a wiki? Don't lie, you linked 'La enciclopedia' and 'Kinderwiki', a copy of it.vikidia --Sepp.P 17:46, 14 February 2014 (CET)

Conclusion

Six users supports Comedia. Zero users voted "oppose" and zero users voted "neutral". That is 100% of support and hereby is Comedia successful elected as an administrator. I will request the right by Astirmays for Comedia. Southparkfan 11:34, 17 February 2014 (CET)

Comedia (Patroller)

Comedia (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
I want to mport articles and Astirmays said that's a good idea on IRC. I created a lot of articles and I do more than 300 edits. Yes, I block in other vikidias, but I change and I think that I could be a good user on the future
-- Comedia 22:07, 18 January 2014 (CET)

Support

1. here 's a good user --Sepp.P 22:12, 18 January 2014 (CET)
2. Yes,here 's good user--Seslowin (talk) 22:34, 18 January 2014 (CET).
3.  Support Rome2 (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2014 (CET)
4.  Support Super10 (talk) 12:54, 19 January 2014 (CET)
5.  Support, I want to give him a chance to prove us he have changed. Linedwell (talk) 15:55, 21 January 2014 (CET)

Oppose

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Neutral

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Questions/notes

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Conclusion

5 support, 0 neutral and 0 oppose makes 100% of support. Rights are granted. Southparkfan 21:57, 23 January 2014 (CET)

Comedia (Patroller)

Comedia (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
Because I create a lot of articles and I'm do a good work (I think)

Support

1.  Support - I trust you that you wouldn't misuse it. Southparkfan 12:41, 23 December 2013 (CET)
2. ...
3. ...

Oppose

1.  Oppose Sorry, but status aren't rewards nor medals. Linedwell (talk) 12:58, 23 December 2013 (CET)
2.  Oppose Rate would be forgotten the whole history of ES. Comedia what caused this wiki is worthy no status. The publishing wars, insults, rules arbitrarily created, requests for removal. Creating articles is one thing, having a clean record is something else. Today on "Simple English" Comedia is nice to have the power. Moreover Comedia is blocked on the Vikidia Spanish.--Lolo7433 (talk) 13:47, 23 December 2013 (CET)
3.  Oppose idem. Super10 (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2013 (CET)

Neutral

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Questions/notes

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Conclusion

Too many oppose, the status haven't been granted. Linedwell (talk) 10:43, 31 December 2013 (CET)