Vikidia currently has 3,239 articles. Improve it!

Join Vikidia: create your account now and improve it!

User talk:Jilly

From Vikidia, the encyclopedia for 8 to 13-year-old children that everybody can make better
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Jilly's Talk Place[edit source]

AP97 ice floes (3422931129)

Welcome[edit source]

Welcome to Vikidia, Jilly!

Welcome to Vikidia, the encyclopedia for 8 to 13 year olds that anyone can improve
    • Happy Don't hesitate to modify articles on Vikidia, nor to create new ones. Your help is welcome!
    • You can create your own user page where you can introduce yourself: see Help:Create your own user page.
    • On discussion pages, don't forget to write: ~~~~ to sign, but not on articles! Wink
    • Warning! You should not copy content from other websites, because it's forbidden by law!
    • Text copied and pasted from Wikipedia articles are unnecessary, so they are not admitted here: You can write about the things you like, but say it in your own words!
    • Finally, have fun contributing! Wink

George Edward CTalkContributions 17:16, 12 November 2014 (CET)

thanks bunches!!! Jilly (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2014 (CET)
That's ok! If you have any questions, ask them on my talk page and I'll respond as fast as I can :) George Edward CTalkContributions 18:05, 13 November 2014 (CET)

Hi[edit source]

How are you. --Goldenburg111 (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2015 (CET)

Concerning the article Atheism[edit source]

Good evening Jilly.

I am writing you tonight because I wanted to talk with you about an edit you made to the article Atheism on March 29th, 2019. You undid an edit from an IP address, User:, because you stated it wasn't an improvement and directed the user to the article's talk page.

I have responded to the conversation on the talk page with the IP, and have subsequently allowed their edit, which is now the current revision on the article. The reason for this is that the version which had been here since the article was started, was biased in a negative way against Atheism and contained a lot of factual inaccuracy and some vandalism too. Given that, the original version of the article wasn't suitable.

In this instance, the user's rewrite of the work met the standards we need. Any article should be neutral, verifiable and above all, correct!

If you have any questions, please leave me a message on this thread and I will respond here. Thank you :) DaneGeld (talk) 22:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)