Vikidia currently has 2,518 articles. Improve it!
Join Vikidia: create your account now and improve it!
As it has become an occurring issue, I have the bone to bring it up to request for administrators here to discuss the outcome of User:Titanic. So, what evidence do we find here? Well, what we see is that this user is a sockpuppet of Titanic, who seems to be a sockpuppet of Antonie8338, who was blocked on fr.vikidia (I believe so). So there has to be claimes by Rome and Astirmays. Who is which Rome blocked Titanic for the sole reason of sockpuppetry. Recently, Titanic is free to edit, as being unblocked by Astirmays, with the reason: Lets block when there is a problem, not just in case. (Block log of User:Titanic) - (Contributions of Titanic), as seen from recent edits, the user has been making many (although scattered) positive edits. So, I would not like two administrators to fight about this, and I would like a solution that will "stick and stay".
- Of course, Titanic must remain blocked because it is an unfair account Antoine8338 and I do not understand the release made by Astirmays without consultation.
- So it would be nice if other administrators give their opinions (see here in French, sorry). Rome2 (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2014 (CEST)
- This user had previously created 2 accounts and recently requested to use one that was blocked for this sole reason as mentioned above. We prefer for sure that one user sticks to one account, yet it does not facilitate the users involvement to block them for having created two. "unfair" sounds as an excessive word to me since this user was not blocked on this wiki and does not hide that he's got these 2 accounts. That's why I removed this red and derogatory template. Just make a green and soft one and it will be OK. Nevertheless we could block Antoine8338 now as he can use his other account. Astirmays (talk) 23:21, 23 April 2014 (CEST)