Vikidia:Request for permissions/Southparkfan

Southparkfan (Administrator - confirmation)

Summary of votes: The breakdown of the opinions: 75 % 25 % 0 % ( Support : green ;  Neutral : gray ;  Oppose : red)

Southparkfan (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
This is a confirmation vote about my administrator tools: if I do not get enough support to keep them, they could (I do not know if this is a real vote) be removed. I am requesting confirmation because of my inactivity here. Altough I am the most active sysop here (Special:ActiveUsers) and if I am not mistaken the fourth active user, the community maybe think that I am not active enough. If possible I'd like to keep my rights (there are some tasks where they are useful), but if there is no consensus to keep my rights it's okay for me. Regards, Southparkfan Southparkfan 21:22, 1 April 2014 (CEST)
Users can vote from 01 April 2014 until 08 April 2014.

Keep

1.  Support First I thought that this confirmation request was a joke (it was filed on 1st of April)... Two days later it's still there, so now I feel it's time for me to react. Based on the work done by Southparkfan so far, I don't see any reason to revoke his Vikidia Administrator rights. He is steadily active in various namespaces, makes valuable edits to protected pages... His involvement is definitely positive for Vikidia in English. Klipe (talk) 12:50, 3 April 2014 (CEST)
2.  Support No problems = no reason to remove admin rights. --Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2014 (CEST)
3.  Support no problems (for me) Victor (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2014 (CEST)

Remove

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Neutral

1.  Neutral mmmm -- Comedia 19:57, 3 April 2014 (CEST)
2. ...
3. ...

Questions/notes

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Conclusion

User as been confirmed. Vivi-1(fr)^Bla ? 09:58, 10 April 2014 (CEST)

Southparkfan (Administrator)

Summary of votes: The breakdown of the opinions: 100 % 0 % 0 % ( Support : green ;  Neutral : gray ;  Oppose : red)

Southparkfan (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
I think he could be a good sysop and greatly help us setting the wiki up. Linedwell (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2014 (CET)

Hi everyone,

First I want to thank everyone for his or her support or oppose (There aren't any oppose-votes yet but that doesn't matter.). I think I'm not too active enough to be an administrator. Although I can use the rights (Editing the wiki interface and that kind of things are useful), it is the community who decides it. Questions? You may ask them, of course under the "Questions/notes" section. Southparkfan 23:03, 15 February 2014 (CET)

This vote is open from 15 february 2014 to 22 february 2014

Support

1.  Support As I said above. Linedwell (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2014 (CET)
2.  Support Support Support Support -- Comedia 18:06, 15 February 2014 (CET)
3.  Support I think that SouthParkan will to be a good administrator.--Lolo7433 (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2014 (CET)
4.  Support Rome2 (talk) 10:18, 16 February 2014 (CET)

Oppose

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Neutral

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Conclusion

With 4 supports, 0 neutral and 0 oppose (100 %), Southparkfan is elect

Southparkfan (Patroller)

Summary of votes: The breakdown of the opinions: 100 % 0 % 0 % ( Support : green ;  Neutral : gray ;  Oppose : red)

Southparkfan (talk | contribs | blocks | UserRights)
I am requesting patroller because I would like to have access to the rollback feature - then I can undo some edits by me faster. Feel free to ask questions. ;)

Support

1.  Support -- Comedia 13:38, 23 December 2013 (CET) You are a trust user on Wikikids. Now, good work!
2.  Support Good contributor, no reason to vote opposed.Super10 (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2013 (CET)
3.  Support, trusted user on Wikikids, enough for me. Linedwell (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2013 (CET)
4.  Support seems good Vivi-1(fr)^Bla ? 20:04, 24 December 2013 (CET)
5.  Support After your response, I'll support you Beem-Talk™ - Hoi! 12:19, 25 December 2013 (CET)

Oppose

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Neutral

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Questions/notes

1. Same as with Super10's request; I wonder why you need those rights? There are already 4 sysops. They could handle the vandalism when the wiki opens, right? I also don't expect huge amounts of frustrated teens and spambots joining and vandalizing the wiki when it opens. Beem-Talk™ - Hoi! 21:40, 24 December 2013 (CET)

   Hello Beem, first thanks for asking this question. ;) You say there are four sysops. Yes, but: how may are "active"? As you see in my motivation above, it is for rollbacking edits. It can be for vandalism (however the wiki is not even opened - I can't imagine my that there are now users that vandalize), but also for rollbacking mistakes by me. ;) Regards, Southparkfan 00:23, 25 December 2013 (CET)

   Thank you for the answer! I'll vote. Beem-Talk™ - Hoi! 12:18, 25 December 2013 (CET)

2. ...
3. ...

Conclusion

100% of support. The statut will be granted ASAP (message let here). Linedwell (talk) 10:45, 31 December 2013 (CET)