User talk:JohnCCollins

Overwriting content

Sorry was mistaken. George.Edward.C ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 20:50, 9 October 2014 (CEST)

What are you talking about? You are mistaken. I did not overwrite anything here. I added some info from an se.wo article to an existing article here. Articles can be expanded. I did leave a source note saying the expanded info was from the article at se.wp Please get your facts straight before you criticize another editors work. Best regards! JohnCCollins (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2014 (CEST)

Yeah I screwed up as per usual. Sorry about that George.Edward.C ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 21:34, 9 October 2014 (CEST)

My apologies

I sincerely apologize for all this recent drama, I hope for us to erase this from our minds and move on, thanks --Goldenburg111 (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2014 (CET)

Nevermind, you're too stubborn for your own good to accept. --Goldenburg111 (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2014 (CET)

childish behaviour lashing out from Goldenburg111

Please stop making problametic edits like here: http://en.vikidia.org/w/index.php?title=Vikidia:Request_for_administrators/2014_11&curid=5412&diff=53049&oldid=53046

I reverted them since Jilly was trying to raise up drama, I will request a block on you if your immature behavior keeps going on, thanks. --Goldenburg111 (talk) 02:51, 19 November 2014 (CET)

Jilly was posting her side of the story on the admins board where you falsely accused her of sockpuppetry with no ZERO HARD evidence. She posted defending herself . She offerred her self up to be check usered. Why did you really revert Jilly? Only an admin should be reverting Jilly in an admin discussion. She was only posting to give her statement after you accused her of voting twice, AND of sockpuppetry with the kline guy. Everyone need a chance too tell their side. What is the problem goldenburger are you afraid to be checkusered, Jilly said she was not. Are you afraid of being checkusered Goldenburg111  ??? Best Regards JohnCCollins (talk)

AGF

Hi JohnCCollins! About this diff: indeed I changed the case unduly, should have respected original case, sorry. Now my question is about what you wrote in the diff comment: "editor made mistake with AGF"... What does "AGF" mean? Klipe (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2014 (CET)

AGF is a very good thing. What I meant was the editor that made the mistake was acting in good faith! We all learn something new everyday! You learned something. So everything is all good! Best regards, JohnCCollins (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2014 (CET)

OK, thanks! Klipe (talk) 09:35, 24 November 2014 (CET)